When students buy a textbook published by a US company in the NUS co-op, they may have to fork out something like $60 for a copy.
The same book, sold in the US, may cost between $150-$200. The difference? The book cover! Holey-moley!
Well, also, the copy you buy in Singapore will be labelled “International Edition” or, in the past, “Not for sale in the US” or both.
So alert Singapore students heading overseas for studies should do their book shopping at the NUS Co-Op and make large savings.
Is it illegal? Publishers frown on this, but there is no law preventing this. Anyway, students purchases are negligible compared to the large US market so this has not really been an issue
Then Thai student Supap Kirtsaeng studying in the US, had family and friends ship him the cheaper international books from Thailand. He resold them in the US at higher prices and pocketed the considerable profits – close to US$1 million).
This dedicated operation won the ire of publisher John Wiley & Sons Inc. They took him to court and initially won their case in US district and appeal courts.
But on 19 March this year, the previous decisions were overturned by the US Supreme Court.
So it has now been made clear to all that you are free to use, import and resell copyright works in the United States even if they were produced outside of the US. In other words, the US Copyright law’s “first-sale doctrine” does not exert geographic limitations.
Amongst the relieved appear to be US Librarians as well – they can “loan the 200 million foreign-made titles on their shelves without seeking permission from copyright holders or fearing a lawsuit” (“Libraries Can Lend Foreign Books,” by Ry Rivard. Inside Higher Ed, 20 Mar 2013).
To combat this vulnerability, US publishers may decide to sacrifice the smaller profit market of International Editions in Asia, for example, to protect their much larger and lucrative US market.
This would mean my students in Singapore would only see US edition texts in the co-op. They are not going to fork out $150 for a single module text book and I would suggest alternatives.
But I needn’t begin looking for alternatives, there already solutions – custom print and e-books. The latter are already available for most new books and new editions. Happily, this will also lower student’s costs as they are cheaper than text books.
Students are more likely to buy and read a cheap, mobile copy of a recommended text rather than a heavy text book. And that will make their lecturers happy.
And happy too be will the publisher’s representative – lecturers should talk to them if in doubt about your recommended texts. They respond quickly and help with solutions. They don’t want to see $150 textbooks in the co-op either, it’ll mean the death knell for their line of work.
I almost regret the solutions. Using alternative resources for first-year biodiversity from multiple papers and resource webpages would be good training for our first years. But perhaps in later years.
First, they need to learn to read.
- “Libraries Can Lend Foreign Books,” by Ry Rivard. Inside Higher Ed, 20 March 2013.
- “Supreme Court Gives American Consumers Victory Over Copyright Owners in Kirtsaeng vs. John Wiley & Sons,” by Gary Shapiro. Forbes.com, 20 Mar 2013.
- “Kirtsaeng and the First-Sale Doctrine’s Digital Problem,” by Clark D. Asay. Stanford Law Review, 07 May 2013.
- “How Supap Kirtsaeng’s Textbooks Idea Led to Supreme Court,” By Greg Stohr. Bloomberg, 26 Oct 2012